Box Office Collection of Golmaal Again
Why practice some movies fail and others brand millions? The reasons vary from motion picture to film, but one thing is sure. It doesn't thing if a picture show has an enormous budget, expert marketing and the hottest actors in Hollywood. The audience decides if a movie is worth the price of admission.
When a movie flops at the box office, it creates a financial ripple effect that is felt from the benefactor to the producer. Hollywood has produced more duds than hits over the years. Allow's take a look at the biggest box office bombs in the history of the business.
The Wolfman (2010) – Estimated Loss: $76,000,000–$80,000,000
The audiences in 2010 had werewolf fever. Unfortunately, this more traditional story of an American homo getting attacked by a werewolf and transforming into one didn't win over audiences similar the Twilight series.
The movie had a stellar cast of A-listers, including Benicio del Toro, Emily Blunt and Anthony Hopkins, but even they couldn't salve it from box function corrigendum. Information technology didn't make back the $150 million upkeep and was greeted with mixed reviews. On the bright side, it eventually turned into a cult classic, making it a piddling more successful than most of the other movies on our list.
Every twelvemonth, studios release a movie hoping to win big at the Oscars. Windtalkers tells the story of ii U.Southward. Marines sent to protect Navajo Marines who used their unwritten native language to communicate safely on armed services radios. Information technology's based on an incredible true story, and it should take qualified as an American movie classic.
The movie received negative criticism for its clichéd war scenes and its lack of focus on the Native American actors in comparison to the screen time given to star Nicolas Muzzle. In the stop, this picture didn't get the accolades the creators expected.
Tomorrowland (2015) – Estimated Loss: $76,000,000–$150,000,000
This aggressive sci-fi motion-picture show stars George Clooney as a old boy-wonder who has e'er had a passion for science and invention. Equally an developed, he teams upward with a like-minded, curious young girl, played past Britt Robertson. They work together to explore the mysteries of fourth dimension and space. Eventually, the team ends up somewhere they thought only existed in their minds.
It sounds intriguing, simply audiences and critics weren't interested, and information technology didn't meet box office expectations. In fact, it but received a 50% approval score on Rotten Tomatoes, non because it was boring, simply because information technology had too much going on.
Power Rangers (2017) – Estimated Loss: $76,000,000
The latest installment in the popular Power Rangers franchise was supposed to be ane of the biggest movies of 2017. It was a revival of every '90's kid'south favorite evidence, and it featured autistic and LGBTQ actors, a showtime for a superhero film.
Sadly, the film's progressive casting and special effects didn't turn this movie into the blockbuster the creators anticipated. Critics cited tonal inconsistencies, and audiences apparently only weren't interested in a modernized accommodation of the story. In the end, Power Rangers concluded up being one of the biggest flops of the entire year.
How Practice Yous Know (2010) – Estimated Loss: $76,000,000–$105,000,000
Everyone loves a good one-time-fashioned rom-com, right? That was the thought behind How Exercise You Know? The flick stars America'south sweetheart Reese Witherspoon, who plays a woman who merely got cut from the UsaA. women'south softball team.
As if that's non enough, she gets defenseless in a love triangle with her current pro brawl swain (Owen Wilson) and a corporate do-gooder played past the affable Paul Rudd. The connectedness between her career and beloved troubles is weak, and many critics said the movie lacked a functional plot. In the cease, no ane wanted to see this confusing, go-nowhere flick.
Sahara (2005) – Estimated Loss: $78,000,000–$100,000,000
Moving-picture show adaptations of books often turn into instant classics or become some of the biggest bombs in the flick industry — Sahara fits into the latter category. The movie didn't do a peachy task of telling the story in Clive Cussler'southward bestselling novel, and movie-goers didn't like information technology.
This comedy-activeness movie didn't exercise well with viewers, who found the chemistry between Matthew McConaughey and Penelope Cruz to be non-existent. The overall script lacked originality, and the movie didn't fare well with critics either. Even though information technology was visually highly-seasoned, the beauty of the Sahara desert couldn't rescue this failure of a movie.
Gods of Egypt (2016) – Estimated Loss: $79,000,000–$ninety,000,000
When volition Hollywood realize they tin can't produce Egyptian-themed movies with primarily white casts anymore? You lot would recall they would know by now that audiences don't similar information technology, and Gods of Egypt was no exception. If anything, this movie taught anybody a long overdue lesson on the importance of accurate representation.
The film received tons of backlash over the casting — plenty for Lionsgate and director Alex Proyas to upshot an apology for the casting gaffe. That wasn't the merely problem critics institute with the movie, however. They too ripped it to shreds for its lackluster acting, boring script and overuse of special effects.
The Man from U.N.C.L.East. (2015) – Estimated Loss: $80,000,000
Directed by fan favorite Guy Ritchie, this film was based on the popular 1960'southward Goggle box show. The rights to the testify were purchased all the way back in 1994, but numerous rewrites delayed the pic'southward product, and information technology wasn't released until 2015.
All that time spent trying to get the script just right didn't pay off, unfortunately. Based on the movie's weak box office performance, it may have even washed more harm than proficient. Even with actors who were at the summit of their game, like Henry Cavill, The Man from U.N.C.L.E. received mixed reviews from critics and failed to concenter an audience.
Fantastic Four (2015) – Estimated Loss: $eighty,000,000–$100,000,000
In the terminal twenty years, the globe has enjoyed a flood of superhero movies, and the genre has turned into a highly profitable Hollywood commodity. Even remakes of memorable favorites have fared well — until the Fantastic Four. The latest adaptation of Marvel's commencement family did non win over fans.
This reimagined version of the famous comic really angered many longtime fans because of its wildly dissimilar storyline. Other than the acting, which received mixed reviews, critics and viewers weren't impressed and chosen the motion picture cheesy, uninteresting and predictable. To add insult to injury, the movie but has a meager 9% approving rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Ouch!
Blade Runner 2049 (2017) – Estimated Loss: $fourscore,000,000
In some cases, even movies with adept reviews tin bomb. This follow-upwardly to the original 'lxxx'south Bract Runner is a good case of that. Blade Runner 2049 had a stellar cast, including Harrison Ford and Ryan Gosling, impressive art direction and Oscar-winning photography. It was well-received by critics and fans and accomplished an 87% approving rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
None of these things seemed to help the moving-picture show'southward performance at the box office. It underperformed and ended up costing the studio millions of dollars. Many people speculate that the lengthy run-time of 163 minutes was probably more time than most people wanted to spend in a theater.
Supernova (2000) – Estimated Loss: $83,000,000
Is there a term for a film that underperforms then spectacularly that "flop" doesn't fifty-fifty practise it justice? If so, then Supernova definitely falls into that category. The motion-picture show had a $xc million production budget but only grossed $14.viii million, making it one of the biggest losses in Hollywood history.
This film not just failed to fill up movie seats, but it too got scathing reviews. To appointment, information technology only has a score of nineteen% on Rotten Tomatoes. Sci-fi fans everywhere consider it to be a joke considering of its lack of excitement, confusing storyline and mediocre special effects.
Valerian and the City of a K Planets (2017) – Estimated Loss: $84,000,000
Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets seemed to accept a lot going for it prior to its debut. The movie had an A-list cast with British stars Clive Owen and Cara Delevingne, great marketing and a high product budget, but all of these things ended up working confronting it.
The price of ad and product really cost and then much that it didn't turn much of a profit, even with decent attendance numbers. Even though it wasn't the worst pic ever made, the reviews were mixed, which didn't assistance its cause. The movie only has a 43% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
Town & Country (2001) – Estimated Loss: $85,000,000
Boondocks & Country has earned a reputation as one of the worst movies ever made. The Hollywood Reporter even went so far every bit to listing information technology equally the fifth-biggest flop of the 2000s. The moving-picture show had a star-studded ensemble cast that included Warren Beatty, Diane Keaton, Gary Shandling and Goldie Hawn, but that wasn't plenty to win over audiences.
Critics and moving-picture show-goers alike found the plot to be confusing, the characters unlikeable and the editing to be confusingly bad. In the end, it only grossed $10.four million and has a beggarly thirteen% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes, making it a low signal in the careers of everyone involved.
Treasure Planet (2002) – Estimated Loss: $85,000,000
This animated have on the archetype Robert Louis Stevenson novel Treasure Isle proves that sometimes information technology's best to leave a fourth dimension-honored story alone. Fifty-fifty though it was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Animated Characteristic, information technology wasn't well-received by most critics, and audiences didn't give it the time of mean solar day, either.
Anybody agreed that the animation was stunning and visually impressive, but the story was considered weak. I tough critic, A.O. Scott, even chosen information technology a "brainless, mechanical picture." On the other hand, for those who did see it, the movie currently has a 69% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
Seventh Son (2014) – Estimated Loss: $85,000,000
Critics didn't seem to care for this fantasy moving picture that was based on the famous novel The Spook's Apprentice. Many blamed the lack of imagination and an overload of special effects for making it one of the most boring flops of 2014. It'southward one you might non even retrieve hearing near, as information technology virtually seemed to disappear overnight.
The but saving grace of the film was its stars, including Jeff Bridges and Julianne Moore, but even they couldn't exercise much to help. The movie ended up losing tens of millions of dollars and has since been forgotten along with the rest of Hollywood'southward bombs.
Pan (2015) – Estimated Loss: $86,000,000–$150,000,000
Peter Pan is i of the nigh famous, beloved children's stories in the world, but that didn't make people desire to see the 2022 live action film Pan. The latest in nearly a dozen film adaptations of the archetype story, the film was criticized for its reliance on CGI and its unimaginative storytelling.
Besides the weak script and the overuse of special effects, an exuberant amount of money was spent on marketing for the film. In improver to the already huge upkeep of $150 million, $100-$125 million was spent on advertising lone, putting the movie in a financial hole.
A Wrinkle in Time (2018) – Estimated Loss: $86,000,000–$186,000,000
When it comes to picture show making, appetite is a good thing, but sometimes movies are besides aggressive for their own good. A Wrinkle in Fourth dimension is a perfect case of that. The long-awaited movie adaptation of the famous volume failed to win audiences over and added to the already long listing of failed books-turned-movies.
Critics felt information technology was a visual masterpiece but also thought creators bit off more than they could chew. Even strong performances from famous faces like Oprah Winfrey, Reese Witherspoon, Chris Pino too equally newcomer Tempest Reid couldn't create the same captivating magic the volume had.
Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) – Estimated Loss: $86,000,000–$106,000,000
This fantastical, modern have on a babyhood archetype isn't the biggest flop on the listing, just it didn't plow out to exist a moneymaker for the studio. This CGI-heavy movie directed by Bryan Singer got a mixed bag when it came to its reception, with audiences and critics disagreeing on its merits.
On Rotten Tomatoes, the moving-picture show scored a measly 53% with a lot of viewers calling information technology boring, unnecessary and predictable. Some critics, nonetheless, felt the motion picture was action-packed and entertaining. Hollywood Reporter critic Todd McCarthy even said the movie was better than The Hobbit.
Jupiter Ascending (2015) – Estimated Loss: $87,000,000–$120,000,000
Unfortunately, the only thing people seemed to like about Jupiter Ascending was the cute special effects, and that wasn't enough to salvage it from losing big time at the box part. At the time, people were already inundated with space movies, and this movie didn't have a potent plenty story to compete.
The Wachowski-directed infinite fantasy merely grossed $47 one thousand thousand in the U.S. and got negative reviews from critics. Despite fairly original and novel world-building, some professionals reviewing the motion-picture show said the script was "incoherent." Audiences didn't seem impressed either, and the movie currently has a 27% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
Rise of the Guardians (2012) – Estimated Loss: $93,000,000
This one is another disappointing example of a movie adaptation gone wrong. Rise of the Guardians, released in 2012, is an blithe adaptation of the pop children'due south book The Guardians of Childhood. Sadly, having a well-told story already laid out doesn't guarantee picture success.
Rising of the Guardians failed to do the original story justice and concluded up wasting a ton of money on marketing. This combination didn't pay off in the long-run, and the studio lost around $93 one thousand thousand. At least kids seemed to like it, and many reviewers on Rotten Tomatoes gave information technology a positive review for this reason.
Evan Almighty (2007) – Estimated Loss: $88,000,000
This follow-upward to Bruce Omnipotent didn't exactly match its predecessor's success — nowhere near it, really. The movie is oftentimes regarded as one of the worst sequels of all time. Critics complained that, unlike the first movie, Evan Almighty was a movie that had as well many special effects and offered as well few laughs.
Fans of the original were put off by the almost preachy tone of the sequel, and it only received a 23% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Jim Carrey has a reputation for bailing on sequels to his movies. In this case, it looks like he made a wise choice.
Cutthroat Island (1995) – Estimated Loss: $89,000,000
Cutthroat Island didn't win big at the box role, but it did win the Guinness World Record title for Earth's Largest Box Role Bomb. Fortunately, Guinness did away with that record, just it doesn't modify the fact that this was ane of the biggest bombs in Hollywood. It stood unchallenged for years equally the biggest black marker on the box part.
The countless problems on ready and with production were the main causes for this movie'southward failure. In fact, the movie did and so poorly that pirate movies were essentially forbidden in Hollywood for years until the success of Pirates of the Caribbean area changed all that.
R.I.P.D. (2013) – Estimated Loss: $91,000,000–$115,000,000
Who would have thought you could become wrong with an action-comedy starring everyone's favorite heartthrob Ryan Reynolds and the iconic Jeff Bridges? Well, manifestly, R.I.P.D. is proof y'all can. Despite the box office appeal of Reynolds, this movie couldn't manage to fill theaters.
It's based on the popular comic book just just doesn't compare to the actual comic, and fans were left disappointed. The concept didn't seem to resonate with audiences, who found the movie to be goofy and downright awful. That would explicate the 13% Rotten Tomatoes approval rating.
The Promise (2016) – Estimated Loss: $94,000,000–$102,000,000
The Hope tells the story of a beloved triangle between a brilliant medical student, a beautiful young adult female and her current beau, all ready in the historic days of the Ottoman Empire. The creators might have been hoping for an Oscar nomination or even a win, but it didn't happen with this anticlimactic film.
The story wasn't terrible, but it wasn't impressive, which may exist the reason behind the movie'southward dismal performance with audiences and critics. Christian Bale and Oscar Isaac are known for their incredible acting skills, but even their talent couldn't go people to watch this movie.
The Alamo (2004) – Estimated Loss: $94,000,000
In Hollywood, remakes tin can be pretty risky when producers are upwardly against the success and expectations established by the original. The 2004 version of The Alamo is one example of a failed remake. This movie had a lot of things working confronting its potential for success.
For ane, information technology was filmed on one of the largest sets in Due north America, which added to its already staggering budget. The previews weren't well received, which delayed the release. One time it was released, information technology had to compete with The Passion of the Christ. Basically, this movie didn't stand a chance.
Concluding Fantasy: The Spirits Within (2001) – Estimated Loss: $94,000,000
The pop Final Fantasy series has proven to be ane of the nigh successful, longest-running video game franchises in history, only all that market goodwill didn't prove helpful when Terminal Fantasy: The Spirits Within was released in theaters. The moving-picture show was ambitious and visually impressive, but that was about it.
The studio hoped the mind-blowing blitheness and big-name actors like Alec Baldwin providing voice talent would exist enough to make more than than the $137 million upkeep, but they didn't. The detailed graphics had never been seen before, simply audiences and critics still found the characters to be stiff and unrealistic.
The Lone Ranger (2013) – Estimated Loss: $95,000,000–$190,000,000
Later the international success of the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise, Disney thought they could use Johnny Depp'due south star ability to bring in some more large bucks. Unfortunately, they chose the wrong projection because The Alone Ranger was a huge bomb.
The motion picture'southward massive production and marketing budgets failed to draw audiences in to spotter the movie. Despite nearly single-handedly reviving the swashbuckling genre, Depp failed to practise the same with the epic western. Information technology probably didn't aid that many people who watched it were more than a piffling irked to see a white guy playing a Native American character, merely the weak story gets most of the arraign.
The Mummy (2017) – Estimated Loss: $95,000,000
Subsequently the massive success of the Brendan Fraser trilogy, producers likely saw more box office gold to be mined from the Mummy franchise. But did this series really need some other reboot? After watching this 2022 version, the answer is "no." Fifty-fifty Tom Cruise couldn't salve this disaster of a movie, and it ended upwardly getting pulled from 800 theaters afterward three weeks.
What was the crusade of the laughable turnout? Deadline Hollywood blamed it on "blockbuster fatigue," saying that audiences were burned out on action-packed movies with tons of CGI. It was intended to launch a Dark Universe franchise for Universal, just those plans were scrapped.
The Adventures of Pluto Nash (2002) – Estimated Loss: $96,000,000
Edifice on an already legendary career in standup one-act, Eddie Murphy became ane of the biggest comedic motion picture stars in the '80s and '90s. All of that came to a screeching halt with the release of 2002'southward forgettable The Adventures of Pluto Nash.
Murphy played an interstellar nightclub owner who is trying to keep his business out of the hands of space-age gangsters. Every bit much as people beloved space movies, audiences and critics weren't feeling this ridiculous plot, and it showed in the dismal box office performance. The movie merely brought in a puny $seven million, a tiny fraction of its $100 million budget.
Mars Needs Moms (2011) – Estimated Loss: $100,000,000–$144,000,000
Mars Needs Moms might be one of Disney's biggest blunders. Information technology had a archetype problem with overspending, which explains the $150 million dollar budget. In addition to the enormous production budget, the studio spent $25 million on advertising. This fabricated information technology nearly impossible for Pixar to turn a turn a profit, which they didn't.
Expenses weren't the only problem, however. No one seemed to like the movie, by and large due to its creepy hyper-realistic animation. It got terrible reviews and currently has a 37% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes. If yous missed this one when information technology came out, the merely value is for a blench-watch.
Source: https://www.ask.com/entertainment/biggest-box-office-bombs-hollywood-history?utm_content=params%3Ao%3D740004%26ad%3DdirN%26qo%3DserpIndex
0 Response to "Box Office Collection of Golmaal Again"
إرسال تعليق